[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?)
From: |
Andrew Haley |
Subject: |
Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?) |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:54:29 +0000 |
David P Grove writes:
> I think you need to understand the point of the benchmark suite.
> The whole goal is reproducible science, so if someone doesn't cite
> the exact version of the benchmarks, then it isn't useful (in an
> academic sense). The license forces that plus proper academic
> credit (ie a citation) for the benchmark suite, which personally I
> think is quite fair
It's unlikely that anyone will disagree with that. The question is
whether copyright law is a reasonable way to enforce it.
Andrew.
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), (continued)
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), David P Grove, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Chris Pickett, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Stephen Crawley, 2005/03/09
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Archie Cobbs, 2005/03/10
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?), Dalibor Topic, 2005/03/10
- Re: benchmarks (was Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?),
Andrew Haley <=
- Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, zander, 2005/03/08
Re: Progress on a Classpath mauve suite?, Bryce McKinlay, 2005/03/09