Re: [Jamvm-general] Re: JamVM 1.3.0 released

[Robert Lougher]

Hi Chris,

Thanks for the positive feedback :)  Very interesting result, though
of course, on any computational task Apple's (Sun's) JIT is much
faster (8x on jBYTEmark).  But if we're just comparing interpreter
performance, from my benchmarking,  JamVM is around 80% faster...

Thanks,

Rob.

On Apr 1, 2005 10:09 PM, Chris Burdess <address@hidden> wrote:
> Robert Lougher wrote:
> > I'm pleased to announce the release of JamVM 1.3.0
> > (http://jamvm.sourceforge.net).  This release adds support for Mac OS
> > X/Darwin, along with several other feature enhancements.
> 
> Can I just say:
> 
> dog [~] uname
> Darwin
> 
> dog [~] time java test
> Calling Locale.getAvailableLocales
> number of locales: 134
> 
> real    0m3.630s
> user    0m2.680s
> sys     0m0.770s
> 
> dog [~] time jamvm test
> Calling Locale.getAvailableLocales
> number of locales: 274
> 
> real    0m0.295s
> user    0m0.170s
> sys     0m0.110s
> 
> JamVM totally rocks.
> --
> Chris Burdess
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Jamvm-general mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamvm-general
>