Re: Removing GtkLookAndFeel

[Lillian Angel]

Please do not remove the gtk icons, they are used for the
BasicLookAndFeel right now.

Thanks,
Lillian angel

On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 11:32 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> Surely they'd be needed to implement getPlatformLookAndFeel() or
> >> whatever the method is called? (along with a hypothetical
> >> gnu.javax.swing.plaf.qt package for KDE users)
> 
> Dalibor> So I am wondering whether anyone uses them (and for what they are 
> used
> Dalibor> ;). As the code is neither built nor referenced from the rest of the
> Dalibor> library code, I'm wondering whether one can safely remove it.
> 
> My impression is that they were the start of a gtk-like plaf, but then
> never finished.  I think it would be fine to remove them.  Just make a
> tag or something before you delete them so that it is easy to
> resurrect them later if someone really wants to.
> 
> Dalibor> So I'd propose removing the unused classes, but keeping the
> Dalibor> icons subdirectory around, since that one is used by
> Dalibor> javax.swing.
> 
> Probably these should be moved to resource/ anyway.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Classpath mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath