Re: Aicas again

[Dalibor Topic]

Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2006, at 10:02 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
> > I doubt that will change much for Darwin, either way, since Darwin is 
> > different enough from Linux to trigger portability issues. The same 
> > would be the case if GNU Classpath had more developers using Cygwin, 
> > which also gets regularly broken, in my experience, and will get 
> > regularly broken in the future no matter what approach to portability 
> > layers we take.
>
>
> Darwin is that much different than most *BSD's.  Now the macro stuff 
> makes things un-debuggable.
> I would recommend using static (inline) functions.  Just using "#if 
> HAVE_" instead and then having
> different files duplicating the stuff over and over again would be no 
> more.  There is already enough
> duplicated code, why add more even in the same project.

Yeah, anything over C macros for me, too.

cheers,
dalibor topic