[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities |
Date: |
26 Feb 2003 14:01:09 +0000 |
Julian Scheid <address@hidden> writes:
> Nic Ferrier wrote:
> > I think it should be easy to frig something dirty with Thread
> > context attributes. I'll take a look at what you've done.
>
> You mean using pthread_getspecific() and the like? Good idea,
> I didn't think of that before. This should allow for a nicer
> workaround.
I haven't checked but these _should_ map into the java.lang.Thread
methods that do the same thing (hopefully).
Nic
- [Classpathx-discuss] LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/25
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/26
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/27
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/27
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, David Brownell, 2003/02/25