commit-gnue
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gnue] r7910 - trunk/gnue-forms/src/GFObjects


From: reinhard
Subject: [gnue] r7910 - trunk/gnue-forms/src/GFObjects
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 07:29:05 -0500 (CDT)

Author: reinhard
Date: 2005-09-15 07:29:04 -0500 (Thu, 15 Sep 2005)
New Revision: 7910

Modified:
   trunk/gnue-forms/src/GFObjects/GFBlock.py
Log:
Removed an unused variable, added some comments.


Modified: trunk/gnue-forms/src/GFObjects/GFBlock.py
===================================================================
--- trunk/gnue-forms/src/GFObjects/GFBlock.py   2005-09-15 12:20:55 UTC (rev 
7909)
+++ trunk/gnue-forms/src/GFObjects/GFBlock.py   2005-09-15 12:29:04 UTC (rev 
7910)
@@ -365,6 +365,8 @@
   #
   # deleteRecord
   #
+  # FIXME: This is a duplicate of GDataSource.__trigger_delete. Do we really
+  # need both?
   def deleteRecord(self):
     """
     Doesn't really delete the record but marks it for
@@ -584,9 +586,6 @@
     if not self._recordCount:
       self.newRecord()
 
-    # The block is not uncommitted any more
-    self.__uncommitted = False
-
     self.mode='normal'
 
 
@@ -725,9 +724,10 @@
   # Call a datasource's function
   # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
+  # FIXME: This is a duplicate of GDataSource.__trigger_call. Do we really need
+  # both?
   def callFunction (self, name, parameters):
     try:
-      self.__uncommitted = True
       # Remember the current record; the record pointer is not reliable between
       # postAll and requeryAll!
       current = self._resultSet.current
@@ -746,9 +746,10 @@
   # Update the current datasource's record set
   # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
+  # FIXME: This is a duplicate of GDataSource.__trigger_update. Do we really
+  # need both?
   def updateCurrentRecordSet (self):
     try:
-      self.__uncommitted = True
       self._dataSourceLink.postAll ()
       self._dataSourceLink.requeryAll (False)
     finally:





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]