consensus
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU/consensus] GNU Consensus Manifesto -- Comments


From: hellekin (GNU Consensus)
Subject: Re: [GNU/consensus] GNU Consensus Manifesto -- Comments
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:50:33 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121123 Icedove/10.0.11

On 01/09/2013 10:03 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> 
> My approach was more aimed at interop with the wider web.
>
*** That is the same issue I see with SWAT: that the business logic is
built-in the tests. If your application does not follow them, it's
excluded, by definition.

No, really, the first step is "hello, world.", and let coders implement
it, and describe their technical solution: we'll see then, how Briar
acts differently than a Web-based application, etc.

Embedding constraints in the tests before any reports are made will
definitely exclude some programs. But it would be more interesting to
understand why these programs didn't choose the "mainstream" path.

Michael, welcome! Can you make a short presentation of what problem
you're trying to solve with Briar? (You can use the [SH] topic prefix.)

==
hk

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]