coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [coreutils] stdbuf util prevents easy static building of coreutils


From: Mike Frysinger
Subject: Re: [coreutils] stdbuf util prevents easy static building of coreutils
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:02:49 -0400
User-agent: KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.34; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )

On Monday, July 19, 2010 16:58:31 Jim Meyering wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > looking at the configure.ac script, i thought this might work:
> >     ./configure --enable-no-install-program=stdbuf,libstdbuf.so
> > 
> > but alas, it does not
> 
> My first reflex was that simply excluding stdbuf should suffice:
> 
>   ./configure --enable-no-install-program=stdbuf
> 
> but I haven't looked at what that would imply on the
> implementation front.  Wouldn't want to unduly specialize...

i'm sure you saw the bugs-coreutils report, so just following up for mail 
archives completeness ...

stdbuf does disable fine, but libstdbuf.so does not.  it is always enabled for 
gcc targets.  so i posted a patch to make the latter conditional on the 
former.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]