[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ~ddd \in FOLDOC
From: |
Andreas Zeller |
Subject: |
Re: ~ddd \in FOLDOC |
Date: |
26 Feb 2001 17:33:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
Hi!
"F. Liekweg" <address@hidden> writes:
> I just noticed that http://www.foldoc.org knows about gdb and xdbx,
> but not about ddd. Being a frequent ddd user, I'd maintain that if
> xdbx gets an entry in the FOLDOC, than ddd shouldn't be missing ...
> Wouldn't You like to submit a ddd entry to the FOLDOC?
Well, anyone can do so, so - just go ahead! The problem, however, is
that the FOLDOC editor is somewhat overloaded:
Please don't send me any new definitions for the moment, I
have a huge backlog awaiting processing. If you want to help,
you could become a Guest Editor.
So, feel free to support FOLDOC, and while you do so, feel free to
include an entry on DDD.
Andreas - who'd love to become a Guest Editor, if he had enough time...
--
Andreas Zeller Universitaet Passau
http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/st/staff/zeller/
- ~ddd \in FOLDOC, F. Liekweg, 2001/02/26
- Re: ~ddd \in FOLDOC,
Andreas Zeller <=