[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/
From: |
H. J. Lu |
Subject: |
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?) |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:38:25 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 01:25:03PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:33:09PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >
> > > is the one reported by HJ Lu and still present in both trees. It would be
> > > nice if the utils.exp bug and the other bugs were fixed in both
> > > repositories while we wait for a new, official release.
> >
> > Well, isn't that the usual process ? :-) Subversions just let me back in
> > since it processed my new key. I can now do some testing & checkin of a fix
> > for this particular bug.
> >
> > I'd also like to get Chris's XML format change before I get too involved
> > in getting a new release ready. :-)
>
> While we are on the subject of "deja" bugs, there is a buffer truncation
> problem that particularly seems to plague hppa-linux but I have also seen
> if occur on i386-linux. This affects tests that produce a large amount
> of output. The last part of the data received by dejagnu is truncated,
> usually in the middle of a line. This might be a kernel or glibc
> problem as I never see it under hpux. If anybody has any clues as to
> the fix, let me know.
It sounds like an expect bug I fixed long time ago:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg00804.html
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=623629&group_id=13179&atid=313179
H.J.
- Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), (continued)
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), David Edelsohn, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), John David Anglin, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?),
H. J. Lu <=
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Ben Elliston, 2003/06/07
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), John David Anglin, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06
Re: expect buffer overruns (was: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice), Joern Rennecke, 2003/06/06
Re: testsuite/*/*/*/*.exp run twice (Was: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/ieee.exp run twice in the test suite?), Rob Savoye, 2003/06/06