[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Master sources?
From: |
Dan Kegel |
Subject: |
Re: Master sources? |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Jun 2003 17:42:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020615 Debian/1.0.0-3 |
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Who uses the repository at sources.redhat.com, and why?
Everyone who tests combined trees from sources.
Oh, so that's the tree used by the gcc developers?
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ does seem to have gcc, glibc, and
dejagnu.
I am in the process of writing a script to build gcc/glibc toolchains
from source and run their regression tests.
Originally I had thought I could use the most recent release of dejagnu,
but recent messages on this list convinced me I'd at least need to
include a few patches. Now I'm not sure which cvs repository to pull
patches from.
Which cvs repository is authoritative for gcc / glibc / dejagnu?
And which cvs repository should I pull them from if I want to test them
together?
I would have thought the answers to those two questions would be the same,
but perhaps they aren't?
Thanks,
Dan
Re: Master sources?, Rob Savoye, 2003/06/09
Re: Master sources?, Rob Savoye, 2003/06/09