[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interpreting gcc-3.3 "make check" results
From: |
Doug Evans |
Subject: |
Re: Interpreting gcc-3.3 "make check" results |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:01:55 -0700 (PDT) |
Tom Tromey writes:
> >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Doug> The part I'm not sure of is what to specify if one .exp controls
> Doug> several subdirs. Ideally you'd want to be able to specify
> Doug> "foo.exp=subdir/test.c" in case test.c appears in multiple subdirs,
> Doug> but I'm actually not sure this is guaranteed to always work.
>
> The .exp file has to take care to allow things like this, using
> runtest_file_p. Whether or not subdirs work depends on exactly what
> is passed to this function (i.e., it is under control of the .exp
> file).
You mean the .exp file _should_ take care to allow things like this.
My point was that I'm not sure all the relevant .exp's currently do this
(or perhaps whether runtest_file_p supports this).
Maybe they do now, great. It's been a long time since I ran
the gcc testsuite on a frequent basis.