[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
honoring gcc test stack size
From: |
Joel Sherrill |
Subject: |
honoring gcc test stack size |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:47:14 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Hi
I investigated one failure: pr20621-1.x3
and discovered that it is using a LOT
of stack. I don't know what the stack
size limit parameter you gave me is supposed
to do.
I increased the init task's stack to 128K
and that one passed.
The issues for testing rtems now are:
+ how to find tests marked as expected failures
on similar embedded configurations that run
on simulators in gdb.
+ posting results
+ moving on to other targets. :-D
I am running again with the larger stack size
and (I hope) all of the suggestions you both
have made.
Thank you both. I really do appreciate the
help so far. I have wanted to post gcc test
results for rtems for years and never made it
happen.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
address@hidden On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
- honoring gcc test stack size,
Joel Sherrill <=
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/12
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/12
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Joel Sherrill, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/13
- RE: honoring gcc test stack size, Dave Korn, 2008/02/13
- Re: honoring gcc test stack size, Hans-Peter Nilsson, 2008/02/13