denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Release (was Re: [Denemo-devel] checked in a fix to print.c)


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Release (was Re: [Denemo-devel] checked in a fix to print.c)
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:33:00 +0000

On Thu, 2008-01-03 at 06:40 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 15:03 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > I thought it worth while to tidy up this code, now that we have
> > something that works. In addition I've provided warning messages,
icon,
> > and toolbutton for print preview. Please check that all is still
well.
> 
> This still works for me. In regards to the direct printing
stuff....Have
> you looked at the gnome-print api? Does this tie us into gnome though.
I was thinking it probably did.
> Should we have a switch for --with-gnome to include integration into
> gnome such as gnome print?  
I noticed there was a print interface documented in gtk on the web, but
strangely it is absent from the downloaded docs.
I think a portable solution is a must though, and (if we knew how) it
must surely be quite straight forward. We could look in the source code
of evince/gn etc? It is not something I will be working on at the
moment, as I don't have a printer; my next priorities would be:
         1) detecting out of range notes (unplayable on the given
instrument),
which is something I hit up against while doing arrangements. (I have in
mind a Find routine that finds notes (>, < or = to a given note), which
would be a start.)
         2) And, storing more than one movement in one denemo file: each
of
these movements would be what denemo currently calls a DenemoScore; we
did have this for a while, though I don't remember if they printed out
as a suite of movements in LilyPond. I'm fairly sure this can be done
easily, and then we will get continuous page numbering for an entire
sonata, for example, which helps a lot if the pages get scattered all
over the floor!

But if you are happy that Denemo is now in good shape (my only
reservation is the DeleteMeasure thing, which as I have said probably
has coredumps lurking somewhere in it) I think we should go for a
Release.
If anyone knows any cause or impediment, let them speak now!
Richard





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]