Re: [Denemo-devel] Sourceforge

[Richard Shann]

On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 14:37 +0200, N. Gey wrote: 
> At first I'm glad there is now control over sourceforge, again.
> 
> Deleting is not good, I agree. But I would avoide redundancy. If it is 
> not clear what Denemo is about when you enter denemo.org then I can 
> change that, 
> but an additional website is unnecessary.
> 
> If you want to hear my advice:
> -Change the old index.html of the sourceforge html page to a redirect, 
> because It will be linked directly here and there.
> -Delete the old releases @ sourceforge.
> -Change the Homepage-Button on the sourceforge project page to 
> denemo.org, like you did on savannah.
This sounds good - Jeremiah are you up for sorting this out?

> 
> I have made a list of Webpages linking or reviewing to denemo.  Once 
> there is a new Denemo release to download I will send them a message to 
> change the links and maybe write another review.
> I am confident that denemo.org will show up on the first google page soon.
Excellent, (I had literally just typed "I am still struggling with a
broken linux" here when the machine re-booted! Evolution recovered the
message to that point - I'll send this quick)
Richard

> 
> And at last:
> 
> Hi Adam!
> Do you have any plans on developing denemo again?
> 
> Nils
> 
> 
> 
> Richard Shann schrieb:
> > This is excellent news: I think it is important to use the sourceforge
> > site to help potential users, rather than just deleting it. There are
> > thousands of links to it, and will be for a long, long time.
> > Suggestions as to how to manage it? The new site is much more attractive
> > I think, although the opening page does not immediately say that Denemo
> > is a music notation program, starting rather with News. Perhaps
> > sourceforge could provide the quick overview before handing over to
> > denemo.org?
> > Will we be able to control the download links? I guess so.
> > Richard
> >
> > On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 10:06 +0100, Adam Tee wrote:
> >   
> >> On Wednesday 18 June 2008 12:21:01 N. Gey wrote:
> >>     
> >>> Hi Jeremiah, hi Richard
> >>>
> >>> My negotiations with Sourceforge to delete the Denemo project are
> >>> continuing. Since I am an outsider its not easy.
> >>>
> >>> I think one possibility is that you, both, write a support request that
> >>> you want to be granted with Admin rights for the project, since Adam is
> >>> gone. Maybe you can argue with login dates and that they should check
> >>> the last update-status of denemo.
> >>>
> >>>       
> >> I've added Richard and Jeremiah as project admins on sourceforge.
> >>
> >> I'll do the same on savannah it required.
> >>
> >>
> >> Adam
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Denemo-devel mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >>     
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel