[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh
From: |
Jeremiah Benham |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:20:16 -0600 |
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:46:07 +0000
Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> This pattern of the gub build failing at different places each time is
> continuing. On my last attempt from scratch it succeeded with perl but
> then failed with a tar command.
> I think I need to re-install the operating system. Any suggestions as
> to what I might install that would help Denemo become a well-tested
> program? Reliability would be a prime concern, I hate spending time on
> flaky systems.
I would probably just install debian again. I use ubuntu and gub has
never worked for me. It always fails at some point trying to meet the
dependencies. Do you create a seperate /home partition? If so
re-installation is easy with debian based systems. Debian was my first
distribution. I don't know how I managed to install it being such a
newbie at the time. Then a friend convinced me to try Red Hat. I hated
installing software in Red Hat because of the issues of meeting and
installing all the dependencies. Then I tried Gentoo. I liked this for
a while but there was always some issues. It did not just work like
Ubuntu does. I don't think I can recommend Ubuntu either. It takes a
great deal of customization to get things how you like it. I just
recently upgraded and some of my customizations were lost. I did not
want gdm at startup but after upgrade it was set so. The same issue
with pulseaudio. So I would just stick to debian.
Jeremiah
> Richard
>
>
> On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 09:06 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > I upgraded Lenny, but found the new kernel would not boot. I have
> > reverted to the old kernel, but as the compiler etc are new I
> > thought I would try the Denemo 0.8.10 gub build to see if the
> > compiler flakiness was gone.
> >
> > after rm -rf target/
> > and
> > make denemo
> > the build failed with this
> >
> > Command barfed: cd /home/rshann/gub/target/tools/build/perl-5.10.0
> > && make -j2
> >
> > where the relevant bit of the log seems to be this:
> >
> >
> > Making File::Glob (dynamic)
> > Writing compiled form
> > Writing Makefile for File::Glob
> > make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/build/perl-5.10.0/ext/File/Glob'
> > make[2]: *** [byte_t.c] Segmentation fault
> > make[2]: *** Deleting file `byte_t.c'
> > make[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/home/rshann/gub/target/tools/build/perl-5.10.0/ext/Encode/Byte'
> >
> >
> > I don't know if having an earlier kernel and later tools could be
> > responsible...
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
- [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh, Richard Shann, 2009/11/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh, Richard Shann, 2009/11/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh,
Jeremiah Benham <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh, Richard Shann, 2009/11/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh, Jeremiah Benham, 2009/11/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh, Richard Shann, 2009/11/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh, Nils, 2009/11/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Building Denemo 0.8.10 from gub, afresh, Richard Shann, 2009/11/06