Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo Infrastructure

[Nils Gey]

There is some serious opposition against the GPL3. I know the GPL2 quite well 
but I have to check again whats different in version 3. 
This is a step we should think over.

The rest, outdated files, missing COPYING and header fiels are of course safe 
to fix and upgrade.

Nils

On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:14:50 +0100
Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:

> I have had an email from Karl Berry, thanking us and suggesting some
> infrastructure work as follows (can somone who knows what this means
> take action):
> 
> ...
> More importantly, it looks like the package hasn't been upgraded to
> GPLv3?  Only a couple of files have any license notice (a problem in
> itself, but skip that for now) -- exportmidi.c and instrumentname.c are
> the ones I saw, and they just say "GPL version 2".  Could you please
> change that to "GPL version 3 or later", and update the COPYING file
> from (for example)
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/doc/COPYINGv3?
> Is that ok?
> 
> Less importantly, I noticed that the common infrastructure support files
> were somewhat out of date.  I didn't check them all individually, but
> things like these:
> 
>   config.guess config.rpath config.sub depcomp install-sh mdate-sh
>   missing mkinstalldirs
> 
> The current versions are available at
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/build-aux.
> (If you're interested in a script to monitor them, let me know.)
> 
> Happy hacking,
> Karl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>