denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] "group as tuplet" ?


From: Bric
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] "group as tuplet" ?
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:06:55 -0400 (EDT)

Well... four months later... bump.
 
(or is my idea horrible, unworthy of consideration?)
 


On June 12, 2011 at 11:24 PM Bric <address@hidden> wrote:

> On June 12, 2011 at 11:08 PM Bric <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Not sure if this feature already exists -- i haven't found it.
> > I'd like to be able to highlight three consecutive notes, and with this new
> > command convert the three highlighted notes into a triplet. I guess, upon
> > completion of the command, there would appear the starting and ending tuplet
> > markers on both ends of the sequence (each marker deletable as it is now)
> >
> > maybe generalize it to n-tuplet (for n consecutive, highlighted notes)
>  
>  
>  forgot to add:  maybe by default, if you request an n-tuplet with this
> feature
> while the number of highlighted notes is LESS than n, denemo should create the
> n-tuplet but compensate for the missing notes by inserting rests (the rests
> FOLLOW the highlighted notes, by default)
>  
> Maybe for when the number of highlighted notes is GREATER than n, denemo could
> either silently ignore the command, or throw some error message somewhere,  or
> do something even more clever ... not sure.
>  
> > > --------------------
> >
> > My current version of denemo (0.9.1) has a glitch, which prompted me to need
> > this feature even more. I was trying to produce triplets within a bar that's
> > already been populated, deleting some notes at the beginning of the bar, and
> > trying to insert triplets in their place (using the "start triplet" and "end
> > triplet" commands).  This caused note jumbling such that notes crowd up into
> > the
> > same space, instead of being consecutive, as I have typed them... The jumble
> > can't be corrected through deletion... everything gets deleted
> >
> > But, I'm thinking that even when the glitch is fixed, it would still help to
> > have such a feature.
> >  



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]