[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Denemo-devel] [bug #36504] Denemo and Lilypond disagree on what needs a
From: |
anonymous |
Subject: |
[Denemo-devel] [bug #36504] Denemo and Lilypond disagree on what needs accidentals |
Date: |
Sun, 20 May 2012 05:54:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 |
URL:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36504>
Summary: Denemo and Lilypond disagree on what needs
accidentals
Project: Denemo
Submitted by: None
Submitted on: Sun 20 May 2012 05:54:31 AM UTC
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
Item Group: None
Status: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
_______________________________________________________
Details:
Denemo considers accidentals to cross octaves; Lilypond doesn't. This causes
different accidentals to appear in the finished output. [Incedentally,
Wikipedia says Lilypond's behavior is standard, but this was surprising to me,
so it's possible this is an obscure fact.]
To illustrate, create a file with, say, F#, F', F#, F#' (or use the attached).
Note how Denemo shows accidentals on the first, second, and third notes, and
not on the fourth. Render. Note how Lilypond only puts accidentals on the
first and fourth notes.
_______________________________________________________
File Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 20 May 2012 05:54:31 AM UTC Name: accidentals.denemo Size: 4kB
By: None
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=25886>
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36504>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [Denemo-devel] [bug #36504] Denemo and Lilypond disagree on what needs accidentals,
anonymous <=