denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Denemo-devel] [bug #36504] Denemo and Lilypond disagree on what needs a


From: anonymous
Subject: [Denemo-devel] [bug #36504] Denemo and Lilypond disagree on what needs accidentals
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 05:54:32 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0

URL:
  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36504>

                 Summary: Denemo and Lilypond disagree on what needs
accidentals
                 Project: Denemo
            Submitted by: None
            Submitted on: Sun 20 May 2012 05:54:31 AM UTC
                Category: None
                Severity: 3 - Normal
              Item Group: None
                  Status: None
                 Privacy: Public
             Assigned to: None
             Open/Closed: Open
         Discussion Lock: Any

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

Denemo considers accidentals to cross octaves; Lilypond doesn't. This causes
different accidentals to appear in the finished output. [Incedentally,
Wikipedia says Lilypond's behavior is standard, but this was surprising to me,
so it's possible this is an obscure fact.]

To illustrate, create a file with, say, F#, F', F#, F#' (or use the attached).
Note how Denemo shows accidentals on the first, second, and third notes, and
not on the fourth. Render. Note how Lilypond only puts accidentals on the
first and fourth notes.



    _______________________________________________________

File Attachments:


-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun 20 May 2012 05:54:31 AM UTC  Name: accidentals.denemo  Size: 4kB  
By: None

<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=25886>

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?36504>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]