denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] [bug #36502] 0.9.4rc4 missing headers


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] [bug #36502] 0.9.4rc4 missing headers
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:07:15 +0100

On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 21:13 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> Would there be anything wrong with just tar gzipping an anonymous git 
> checkout and calling that a release?
As the release is mainly to give the Debian packager a green flag, I
guess this is a question for them - what is the most convenient thing to
put up on ftp.gnu.org so that the new version of Denemo will start
appearing in distros?

Richard


> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
> 
> Dominic Sacré <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> >Hi Jeremiah,
> >
> >On Wednesday 13 June 2012 21:06:33 Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >> On 05/26/2012 08:40 PM, Dominic Sacré wrote:
> >> > On Thursday 24 May 2012 17:54:24 Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> >> >> That is not what I am experiencing. Maybe you can post a tarball? I
> >> >> got different results depending on the configure options.
> >> > 
> >> > Ok, I've uploaded a tarball here:
> >> > http://das.nasophon.de/stuff/denemo-0.9.4-test.tar.gz
> >> 
> >> Can you tar this up again with the current git please. I just tried it
> >> again and there is still missing headers. I tried this on two different
> >> systems. One system is running the latest ubuntu 12.04 and the other is
> >> running debian stable. Attached is the script I use to do make the
> >> tarball. It just does a git checkout and then runs make dist. Thats all
> >> it really does.
> >
> >My (presumed) fix for src/Makefile.am is not in git yet. What happens if 
> >you replace that file with the one from the tarball I posted above, and 
> >then run autogen.sh, configure and make dist again?
> >
> >Without changing src/Makefile.am (just added the headers to the correct 
> >_SOURCES lines, nothing else), the tarballs I build are missing files as 
> >well. Sorry if that wasn't clear from my previous mails.
> >On the other hand, if the configure options really influence the content 
> >of your tarballs, this fix isn't going to help either...
> >
> >
> >Dominic
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]