denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo warnings and code cleanup


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo warnings and code cleanup
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:12:03 +0100

I've just tested this out and it seems to be working fine :)

Richard


On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 16:57 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> On the split branch, evince is now enable by default, but no more
> mandatory. So now I can compile denemo with gtk2 and make some larger
> tests.
> 
> 
> 
> 2013/6/4 Éloi Rivard <address@hidden>
>         I pushed the branch split where the evince part of print.c is
>         now in printview.c . Could you tell me if it is good for you ?
>         
>         
>         
>         2013/6/4 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
>                 On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 13:23 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:
>                 >
>                 > 2013/6/4 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
>                 >         On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:40 +0200, Éloi
>                 Rivard wrote:
>                 >
>                 >         > Tools are now built when you run make.
>                 >
>                 >
>                 >         I have run my usual make (in a parallel
>                 directory to the
>                 >         source
>                 >         directory) and it ran ok, generating the
>                 tools in a parallel
>                 >         directory
>                 >         to the tools directory containing the source
>                 code of the
>                 >         tools.
>                 >
>                 >         >
>                 >         > What do you think of automatically
>                 call ./generate_source
>                 >         > and ./extract_scheme before compiling the
>                 src directory ?
>                 >
>                 >
>                 >         This has to be done in the source directory
>                 not the build
>                 >         directory
>                 >         though.
>                 > You mean in order to make extract_scheme work ?
>                 
>                 and generate_source, they have to be executed at
>                 particular places in
>                 the source tree, not a build directory.
>                 >
>                 >
>                 >         How would you determine the dependencies?
>                 > autotools are very convenient for this. It is easy
>                 to set up
>                 > dependencies between targets by playing with
>                 Makefile.am files
>                 
>                 
>                 In this case a new *.xml file somewhere in the
>                 hierarchy below menus
>                 should trigger a re-run of extract_scheme. It will be
>                 good if it can be
>                 done.
>                 
>                 Richard
>                 
>                 
>                 
>         
>         
>         
>         
>         -- 
>         Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>                 
>         « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>         
> « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]