Re: [Denemo-devel] make dist failing

[Richard Shann]

On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 23:54 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I pushed it to the stable-1.1.2 branch. 

Whoops! I had no intention that we would interrupt the release - we are
just awaiting any more translations before going ahead with that.
Looking at denemo's git, it seems you pushed this to master, which is
correct - stable-1.1.2 is unchanged, which is correct.


> --enable-aubio3 
> sets the CFLAG -D_WITH_AUBIO_3_
> 
> --enable-aubio
> sets the CFLAG -D_WITH_AUBIO_4_
> 
> I will see if I remember how to cherry pick that into master.

so nothing is needed - it already is in master and shouldn't be in the
release - right?

Richard


> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:03:37PM +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-02-05 at 15:23 -0300, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > > On 02/05/2014 03:20 PM, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > > > On 02/05/2014 02:38 PM, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > >> On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 15:59 -0400, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > > >>> i updated src/sourceaudio.c using the new aubio_onset_t. it
> > > >>> simplifies the code quite a bit. i will do the same for
> > > >>> pitchrecog.c now.
> > > >> Paul -
> > > >>
> > > >> I wonder if you could send your work so far on this, it seems that
> > > >> the Debian packaging is hinging on getting aubio4 working in Denemo
> > > >> and I would like to help - if possible I would like to get a new
> > > >> release process going soon, even before this one is out of the door,
> > > >> it always takes so long.
> > > > hi Richard and all,
> > > >
> > > > sorry for the delay. here is the patch i have so far. it lacks the
> > > > set_onset_type() and needs testing, but should compile and run.
> > > 
> > > better with the patch.
> > 
> > Hmm, I did
> > 
> > patch -p1 <update_aubio.diff
> > 
> > and the pitchrecog.c patched fine but all the hunks in sourceaudio.c
> > failed. The sourceaudio.c file hasn't been changed recently so I can't
> > understand why that should be so.
> > Could you send the actual sourceaudio.c that you have?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Richard
> > 
> >