Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 1.2.4

[Richard Shann]

I was just visiting someone who has an apple mac so I downloaded and
ran 
http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-1.2.4-0.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
from 18th July.
It seemed to be working - the font issue fixed - apart from LilyPond
which was either not there or not working...

Richard


On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 12:50 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> I have now downloaded and tested the mingw installer
> 
> http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-1.2.4-0.mingw.exe
> 
> built 16th of July, and it appears to be good for the release (I've
> tested on a Windows Vista laptop).
> 
> Please can any Windows users please download and test either this or the
> equivalent portable version:
> 
> http://denemo.org/~jjbenham/gub/uploads/denemo-mingw-1.2.4.zip
> 
> (which I have also tested).
> 
> If there are no problems we can copy these (and the GNU/Linux binary) to
> http://www.denemo.org/downloads/ and announce the release at the
> weekend.
> 
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2015-07-13 at 00:08 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > Gub is giving me issues as usual. It is being very unpredictable.
> > Aubio failed to configure properly even when I am using the same gub
> > code. It passes if I use python 2.6 in tools but it then will fail to
> > build lilypond. There has to be a way to use the systems python
> > instead of the tools version. I am working on a another mingw build
> > now.
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremiah
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Richard Shann
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> >         No sooner have I written this than I see a new version of the
> >         GNU/linux
> >         binary from today which runs correctly in a virtual machine
> >         with a
> >         Debian O/S. (I tested the earlier 9th July one, and that had
> >         problems).
> >         
> >         Let me know when there is a mingw and I'll give that a
> >         workout.
> >         
> >         Richard
> >         
> >         
> >         On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 12:34 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> >         > Jeremiah,
> >         >
> >         > Have you hit fresh problems with generating binaries? I'll
> >         be happy to
> >         > announce the release once we have at least the mingw binary
> >         for it. We
> >         > already have a Debian package and no doubt Suse and Fedora
> >         will follow
> >         > as soon as we announce.
> >         >
> >         > Richard
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 16:31 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> >         > > Jeremiah,
> >         > >
> >         > > Unless you have some doubts about denemo.ttf being valid I
> >         think we
> >         > > should create the 1.2.4 branch and binaries. Will you have
> >         time for that
> >         > > over the weekend? I could announce the release Mon or Tues
> >         after some
> >         > > sanity-checking.
> >         > >
> >         > > Richard
> >         > >
> >         > >
> >         > >
> >         > > _______________________________________________
> >         > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         > > address@hidden
> >         > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >         >
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         > address@hidden
> >         > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Denemo-devel mailing list
> >         address@hidden
> >         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >         
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel