Re: [dev-serveez] switching to guile

[Martin Grabmueller]

> From: stefan <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 21:09:03 +0100 (CET)
> 
> This is the *most* important thing. If you had to learn too much about the
> scheme syntax you could also start learning a weird configuration file
> syntax setup by ourselves.

Yes, but Scheme syntax is extremely simple and thus easy to learn.

> I dont want schemey ways. I want a readable way.

No comment ;-)

> I dont see a problem with RMS. I think it would make guile more known if
> it worked on Win32. That is generally a good thing. But I am not sure
> about the effort to port the whole package. Raimi: Was it hard to install
> on Linux ? On what libraries does it depend ? Is it as fine grained
> configurable as Sizzle was ?

address@hidden (~/cvs/guile-core): ldd /usr/local/lib/libguile.so
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4008c000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x40090000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400ad000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)

>From ./configure --help:

[...]
  --disable-arrays        omit array and uniform array support
  --disable-posix         omit posix interfaces
  --disable-networking    omit networking interfaces
  --disable-regex         omit regular expression interfaces
  --with-modules[=FILES]  Add support for dynamic modules
  --with-threads          thread interface
[...]

'mgrabmue
-- 
Martin Grabmueller              address@hidden
http://www.pintus.de/mgrabmue/  address@hidden on EFnet