Re: [directory-discuss] Antifeatures: Why GNU Radio needs a "nonfree documentation" flag

[Ian Kelling]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>   >> If someone wraps "standard-conforming simple HTML" documentation
>   >> in some kind of corporate blob unusable to free software users, do
>   >> we accept that as conformant?
>   [quote unbutchered, context restored]
>   > It's not.
> 
>   Yes it is.  

I just downloaded the docs using only free software. So, that is not the
case "in general", as you imply. It is the case for some users who use
different software than me, but I can share it with them. See the 1st 2
paragraphs of
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html#Access