discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] V3 Comments on "BBN's Proposed extensions for dat


From: David Lapsley
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] V3 Comments on "BBN's Proposed extensions for data networking"
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:00:26 -0400
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209

On 6/15/06 2:03 AM, "Eric Blossom" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:51:05AM -0400, David Lapsley wrote:
>> On 6/14/06 2:24 PM, "Michael Dickens" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>> p68, 4.8.1; and p74, 4.8.4: How can an m-block have zero ports?  I
>>> thought that all data / metadata / signals / whatever were
>>> transported via these ports.  Without a port of any type, what can an
>>> m-block do?
>> 
>> Not much!  This is a bug.  I'll fix it.
> 
> Actually an m-block could have zero external ports with no problem.
> In fact that's exactly what the top level m-block looks like ;)
> 
> Eric

Oops!  I wasn't thinking when I typed that :-)

Dave.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]