discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Improvements made to GMSK demod


From: Steven Clark
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Improvements made to GMSK demod
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:54:33 -0400

On 10/15/07, Eric Blossom <address@hidden> wrote:

How does it do with say, 2 samples/sym ?



A quick run @ 2 samp/sym gave:
Old recv...
xcorr offset: 8
num bits compared: 499987
num bit errors: 1275
BER: 0.00255006630172

Old recv plus...
xcorr offset: 16
num bits compared: 499979
num bit errors: 1270
BER: 0.00254010668448

One bit dd recv...
xcorr offset: 17
num bits compared: 499979
num bit errors: 547
BER: 0.00109404594993

Two bit dd recv...
xcorr offset: 17
num bits compared: 499979
num bit errors: 50
BER: 0.000100004200176


So we see that for lower samp/sym, the effect of adding the pre-clock recovery filter is not as great (not surprising, since the signal takes up a larger percentage of the BW). You still get good gains from the changes made to the differential detector, however. The lower the xmit BT, the more improvement you get from switching to a 2 bit diff detect, as it opens the eye diagram by a comparatively larger amount.
I have yet to tweak filter design or threshold bias amount, so performance can potentially get a little better.

I will tidy up the code and try to submit to a branch ASAP.

Is it a no-no to submit any code that depends on 3rd party modules (scipy, pylab)? I would make the core demod not require these, of course, but some of my post-analysis / debug code uses these 2 modules.

-Steven

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]