The "inband" means that the firmware is capable of "inband
signaling". If you don't know what it is then you don't need it.
There shouldn't be any performance loss from using the default
firmware, but if you really want to compile a std_1rx_1tx.rbf file,
it is trivial. It may be worth mentioning that the half-band
filtering might be of significance to you, and it is enabled with
the default firmware.
~Jeff
On 7/25/2010 2:27 PM, Bishal Thapa wrote:
Hi,
I couldn't find documentation on inband_1rxhb_1tx.rbf. The
"1rxhb_1tx.rbf" is self explanatory. But does, the "inband"
makes it any different in terms of its purpose from, lets say,
if it were to be named "std_1rxhb_1tx.rbf". Sorry, if this is a
stupid question?
Sincerely,
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:45 AM,
Bishal Thapa <address@hidden>
wrote:
Hi GNURadioers,
I have a quick question. I am trying to use USRP
running gnuradio-3.3.0 with two daughterboards...
RFX2400. I am going to use one daughterboard to
receive and another to transmit. Do I use the standard
firmware that is loaded by default, std_2rxhb_2tx.rbf
or is there a std_1rx_1tx.rbf somwhere. My question
is, would the performance be better if I were to find
and use std_1rx_1tx.rbf. My decimation rate will be 32
and interpolation rate will be 64.
Thank you very much,
Fellow GNURadioer
--
~Jeffrey Lambert, K1VZX
|