[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor
From: |
Tom Rondeau |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:12:41 -0400 |
On Oct 8, 2010, at 6:21 PM, "Marcus D. Leech" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 04:44 PM, Sharif Shaher wrote:
>> Hi Marcus,
>>
>> That would be great, and greatly appreciated, we are just not sure
>> is if there is a fighting chance or not...thus the question to the forum.
>>
>> Thanks so much,
>> Sharif
> On my dual-core Atom D-510 at 1.67GHz, with 4GB of memory, and an Intel
> 80GB SSD, I can run at 12.5Msps without a problem.
> Once I step it up to 16.67Msps, it starts getting long sequences of
> overruns "O".
I'm impressed. Much better than I would have expected.
>
> This is with the UHD "Single USRP" source, using complex-short output,
> into a "file sink" with a short input, vector-length 2. From
> a USRP2.
Ah, that makes a difference. I was running with the the non-UHD with complex
floats. It's non-vectorized, so the Endian and short-to-float conversion were
costing quite a bit.
Tom
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, (continued)
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Marcus D. Leech, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Jeffrey Lambert, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Tom Rondeau, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Marcus D. Leech, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Sharif Shaher, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Marcus D. Leech, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor,
Tom Rondeau <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Sharif Shaher, 2010/10/08
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, David Evans, 2010/10/09
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Sharif Shaher, 2010/10/11
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Intel Atom Processor, Marc Epard, 2010/10/08