[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DC component
From: |
Gaetano Mendola |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DC component |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:52:21 +0100 |
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Marcus D. Leech <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Please do not get me wrong. I believe that the work from Ettus and the
>> contributors to GNU-Radio are revolutionary! The equipment with the
>> interface to GNU-Radio is not only priced at a level that is affordable to
>> many amateurs and hobbyists, it opens up a brand new world for... (the list
>> is too long to list here)
>>
>> In fact, I am so impressed that I desire to contribute to the community.
>> First by contributing to these forums and second by eventually posting
>> projects to CGRAN!
>>
>> My intent was to let Gaetano know of the potential for spurious signals so
>> that he can properly select a center frequency that is free of these little
>> nuisances.
>>
>>
> Yup, understood.
>
> At lot of the folks on this list come at SDR from a background in
> software/digital, where the "vagaries" of
> the analog world are entirely foreign to them, and they may see the
> existence of such things as "spurs" as
> some kind of horrible defect, rather than an inevitable annoyance. So
> I felt an explanatory note was in order.
>
> Another subset on this forum come from a background where they're used
> to dealing with lab-calibrated
> instruments that their corporate lords and masters (or university
> administration) have spent significant
> money on, so their performance expectations (along certain vectors,
> anyway) will be driven by what they've
> seen their $40-$100K lab instruments do.
>
> The ham radio community is used to dealing with this. As radios became
> more and more broadly-tunable,
> it was no big surprise that "birdies" (a peculiar ham-radio term for
> "spurs") became more and more frequently
> observable, since it was no longer possible to "tune" the underlying
> "birdy-producing" mechanisms to produce
> those "birdies" outside the band of interest, since the "band of
> interest" became larger and larger.
Thank you for your reply, I will soon look at those utilities to see
if I can minimize
the effect.
--
cpp-today.blogspot.com
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] DC component,
Gaetano Mendola <=