discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github


From: Martin DvH
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Volk branch on github
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:06:36 +0100

On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 22:56 -0500, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> There's been a ton of work going on in getting us ready to really
> start using Volk in GNU Radio blocks. Instead of repeating myself,
> here, you can see more about the who/what/when/why/how of the changes
> here: 
> 
> 
> http://www.trondeau.com/blog/2012/2/13/gnu-radio-is-crap-and-other-such-insights.html

I think you copied the wrong link.
You probably meant:
http://www.trondeau.com/blog/2012/2/13/volk-integration-to-gnu-radio.html


Martin

> 
> 
> The basic summary is that I'm seeing amazing performance results and
> I'm very excited to get this into our project.
> 
> 
> I'm really hoping that people can check out the branch and test it out
> against their applications. A number of changes were made inside GNU
> Radio and a handful of blocks have been converted to using Volk, and
> I'd like to see how the performance compares. My own tests show great
> results, but I have a pretty heterogeneous setup (Linux/Ubuntu and
> Intel processors).
> 
> 
> I should have another post on my website later this week discussing my
> benchmark results for the Volk blocks, but anyone interested in
> testing it out on their own should check out
> gnuradio-examples/python/volk_benchmark. The README in that directory
> should help you understand what to do and how to do it.
> 
> 
> We would like to get this merged into GNU Radio master (and therefore
> version 3.5.2) as soon as possible, so I would really appreciate
> feedback and bug reports as soon as possible.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> Tom
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]