discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error on OSX in latest VOLK


From: Nick Foster
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Error on OSX in latest VOLK
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:23:27 -0700

On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Michael Dickens <address@hidden> wrote:
Yes: gcc 4.2.1.  Apple is transitioning from pure gcc to using llvm / clang, so maybe they'll keep those more up to date?  XCode 4.3.2 (latest) provides gcc 4.2.1 using llvm / clang (3.0), which is the latest release of those.  llvm / clang 3.1 is coming out soon, it looks like; so, we'll see.  In the mean time, I'm stuck with Apple's gcc 4.2.1 variant.  So, I'm sure there's a way to make it work with what VOLK is trying to do; but, that's an SEP < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somebody_Else's_Problem > both since I don't have time right now and that it's a little beyond my current expertise in assembly language programming.  Hopefully the VOLK-programmers-that-be can find a quick fix. - MLD

On Apr 18, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Philip Balister wrote:

> On 04/18/2012 09:28 AM, Michael Dickens wrote:
>> I just pulled the latest GIT master, cleaned out everything old, then the usual cmake.  Make errors out with:
>>
>> [  3%] Building C object volk/lib/CMakeFiles/volk.dir/volk_cpu.c.o
>> /var/tmp//ccrCnwC2.s:221:no such instruction: `xgetbv'
>>
>> I'm running OSX 10.6.8, XCode 3.2.3, gcc 4.2.1. - MLD
>
> gcc 4.2.1? Seriously?

Thanks for the update, that's good to know Apple's antediluvian assembler doesn't yet support AVX instructions. Actually, now that I look at it, looks like GCC didn't support AVX until 4.6.0. We'll put in a check disabling AVX if CMake doesn't find GCC 4.6. Unfortunately, there's no safe way to enable AVX instructions without using xgetbv.

--n
 


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]