[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Freq Xlating FIR Filter Question
|
From: |
Marcus Müller |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Freq Xlating FIR Filter Question |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:03:57 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ed!
Numerical accuracy of the exp(jN)*tap operation.
Usually, this accuracy is sufficient by far -- why the question?
Greetings,
Marcus
On 14.04.2014 19:57, Ed Criscuolo wrote:
> When using a Freq. Xlating FIR filter with decimation and taps both
> set to 1, what determines the practical lower limit for the
> resolution of the freq change?
>
> @(^.^)@ Ed
>
> _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio
> mailing list address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTTE09AAoJEBQ6EdjyzlHtnfIIALF/0SFegTHY2153BDrRXY7X
NKFbVljfH38Zn2CnES9m9bYe4DvvapTRRUOzSjm0pqdk3E4LvgU8VutfEqZP1fZH
cRpzxjyoh7vnlUJuUba7dTI7rAS+S3NSghNAE7pm52Y9V8hIVY2qQpFF4AD5PEVg
DOoi76i4NDpSAzzhcuiGeQlSpOzeewLuko8o9yc+lvXe1+0Dxh2dSYclHFIIV4vU
i0kLa7TQcv7RUNn3uPPmh2a9P5q/OPO42z10JXVfYXsl9rl+rpRo6nt96OTBxeBH
vbrHjlcnUXFoDILKBWOtt9p6qw4znNx/Geh2LnZ0wuWItlUS12u7tlVkGKzFw58=
=pajO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----