Hi,
looking at the N200 schematics from files.ettus.com, I'd say:
stick to the 0dBm, your clock signal has to pass a transformer and some
safety/matching circuitry and still ought to be more accurate than the
on-board VCTCXO; the clock multiplexer
(http://www.micrel.com/index.php/en/products/clock-timing/clock-data-distribution/multiplexers/article/29-sy89545l.html)
datasheet says it needs at least a voltage swing of 0.1V after that.
I'm not very much of a circuits person, but I think you won't
deteriorate much of your clock accuracy by using a clock buffer, which
are quite inexpensive (if you need but one and are not afraid to
solder... TI gives away samples for free).
Then again, you're trying to achieve a better clock performance than the
on-board 10MHz ref clock, so I guess you shouldn't start introducing
cheap hardware in the clock signal path...
Greetings,
Marcus
PS: maybe the address@hidden mailing list is better suited
for this... I've added that to CC:
On 04/23/2014 03:07 PM, Antonio Petrolino wrote:
Hi,
I'm using a USRP N210 and I need a 10 MHz reference clock. From
ettus.com I got:
"
Ref Clock - 10 MHz
Using an external 10 MHz reference clock, a square wave will offer the
best phase noise performance, but a sinusoid is acceptable. The
reference clock requires the following power level:
USRP2 5 to 15 dBm
N2XX 0 to 15 dBm
"
So in my case (N210) I should have a minimum 0 dBm signal.
Can someone confirm this information (N2XX 0 to 15 dBm) for N210? The
bad news for me is I have a -15dBm 10 MHz available...
Thank you,
Antonio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio