discuss-gnuradio
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Processing expectations


From: Tom Cook
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Processing expectations
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:31:40 +0000

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 at 13:14 Marcus Müller <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Tom,

I just had to look this up. If you're in GRC, you have "rationale resampler" and "rational resampler base"; they do basically the same, but if you use the one without "base", and don't specify the taps, GNU Radio just automatically designs a filter that avoids all aliasing and imaging, which is done with a python wrapper around the C++ rational_resampler_base_xxx's make function[1]. That's pretty handy in most use cases, but not too much if you want your own filter for some reason.

If you're using the "base" variant, you must specify the taps yourself, because you directly invoke the C++ block's maker. If you go ahead and just use "[1.0]" as taps, you get the aliased results from my pictures.

So if you happen to want to specify the taps, because you can integrate the functionality of a downstream filter into the resampler to save CPU cycles, it doesn't make a difference which block you use.

Ah, I see.  Many thanks for taking the time to explain this.  Where did you look to find out that 'rational resampler' block does an automatic filter design for you?

Regards,
Tom

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]