[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doppler
From: |
Daniel Estévez |
Subject: |
Re: Doppler |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:53:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 01/01/2024 07:51, Jiya Johnson wrote:
Yes I want to use 10GHz/s
Hi all,
Besides the physical considerations that Marcus and Marcus have
mentioned, I *think* it should be possible to adapt the flowgraph you
attached in your first message to generate correctly a chirp waveform at
10GHz/s as you could have in some radars. (Here the "*think*" comes
because most of these blocks use float parameters rather than double,
which for some specific applications can be insufficient. Here I think
this won't be a problem, but I'm not sure until I see it working).
The thing you need to do is to calculate some numbers and use a sensible
sample rate for what you want (there is no reasonable way you're going
to get a 10 GHz/s sweep in a 1 ksps sample rate, which is what you have
in your flowgraph). For instance, say that your chirp waveform sweeps a
bandwidth of 100 MHz. At 10 GHz/s, it takes 10 ms to sweep 100 MHz. This
gives the period of your sawtooth. Let's say you use a sample rate of
200 Msps, which is good to represent a 100 MHz bandwidth signal with IQ
sampling.
Then you need to set the frequency of the sawtooth to 100 Hz ( = 1 / 10
ms). If you want the sawtooth output to have units of Hz, its amplitude
should be 100e6 (to achieve a 100 MHz sweep).
The formulas in the flowgraph you have all work correctly to this
purpose, but to use them, you nee to set the drift_rate to 10e9 (10
GHz/s), the drift_duration to 10e-3 (10 ms, see above), and the sample
rate needs to be at least somewhat higher than 100e6 (say 200e6).
Best,
Daniel.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Doppler, Marcus D. Leech, 2024/01/01
Re: Doppler, Daniel Estévez, 2024/01/02
Re: Doppler,
Daniel Estévez <=