[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble
From: |
Nicola Pero |
Subject: |
Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:43:09 +0100 (BST) |
> > > > The real reason this is important is that distclean is almost a
> > > > requirement when rebuilding from cvs to ensure clean builds.
> > > Which reminds me:
> > > Master/rules.make defines
> > > internal-distclean::
> > > rm -f core
> > > IMHO, that should be 'rm -f core *.core' or 'rm -f *core' as most
> > > BSD-based systems (by default) use 'program.core' to write the memory
> > > image.
> > Thanks!
> > I changed it to be
> > rm -f core program.core
> > Trying to avoid *core or *.core to incidentally delete unintented files
> > :-) let me know if it's still ok.
>
> Ehm, that should be 'program name'.core ... eg. gpbs.core, Gorm.core ...
Whoops ... I'm reverting the change for now.
The only solution seems to be 'rm -f core *.core' but I'm a bit worried
that we might delete stuff we don't really mean to.
- patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, e.sammer, 2002/06/14
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2002/06/14
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, e.sammer, 2002/06/14
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, Chris B . Vetter, 2002/06/14
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, Nicola Pero, 2002/06/17
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, Chris B . Vetter, 2002/06/17
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, Tamas TEVESZ, 2002/06/17
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble, Chris B . Vetter, 2002/06/17
- Re: patch for SSL Makefile.postamble,
Nicola Pero <=