|
From: | Philippe C . D . Robert |
Subject: | Re: variable declaration |
Date: | Mon, 21 Oct 2002 10:45:59 +0200 |
On Monday, October 21, 2002, at 10:07 Uhr, Andreas Heppel wrote:
On 2002-10-19 19:54:24 -0600 Adam Fedor <fedor@doc.com> wrote:So do I, And I suppose there are many more out there who do. Thus, I vote for keeping cod e'the old way'. I also pledge to those ppl programming mere apps to not declare their variable like this, since I can't compile the stuff. And I am not willing to permanently upgrade my compiler or dig through tons of foreign code to be able to use certain apps. And you surely want your apps to be used by ppl, don't you ;-)Philippe C.D.Robert wrote:If you mean the guideline for GNUstep code, I'd rather not use it. Call me backward, but I still use a 2.95 compiler on a few of my systems :-)On Saturday, October 19, 2002, at 06:45 Uhr, Eric Dahlman wrote:On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 04:37 PM, Philippe C.D. Robert wrote:Yes, I noticed that after sending my email - but what it the 'official' guideline wrt using this in GNU code? If we start using it then pre 3.x compilers will not be usable anymore...I just noticed that you can declare a variable at anyplace with the gcc shipped with Mac OS X 10.2, just as you can do it in C++ (and unlike in ANSI C). So you are allowed to doActually this is ANSI C as of the C99 standard.
First let me say that I think this 'feature' is a step backwards, but now it is here and ppl will use it (esp. those working on MOSX), so I think we should have an official statement from the GNUstep maintainers in this respect which clearly defines the way to go...
BTW what's the reason for not using gcc3 (esp. when using ObjC)? -Phil -- Philippe C.D. Robert http://www.nice.ch/~phip
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |