[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should the format used by NSArchiver be changed to XML?
|
From: |
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should the format used by NSArchiver be changed to XML? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:06:45 +0200 |
On 22.04.2003 19:36:59 Martin Brecher wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
>[cut]
>|
>| Go for XML. Memory (both RAM and HD) is cheap these days.
>|
>
>To save disk space you could even zip/gzip the files/bundles like
>Openoffice does. Iirc gnustep has zlib support, right?
I don't like that since you'll always need a tool (gzip) to process the
content of such files. And, the human readability, the greatest pro of XML
is gone.
However how large do gorms/nibs usuallly get? I would not be to greedy for
some K's of memory...
>
>Greetings,
>Martin
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iD8DBQE+pX26kWEEBp53XEURAjv/AKCS6F3SGck42MRKH4anXimn/BLbKgCfYyZL
>5mrdCr6E//cGLoDsT/s8XPE=
>=ASJ3
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss-gnustep mailing list
>Discuss-gnustep@gnu.org
>http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
greetings, Lars