[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality contr
From: |
Philippe C . D . Robert |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control) |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Oct 2003 22:58:35 +0200 |
Hi,
On Wednesday, October 22, 2003, at 11:57 Uhr, Philip Mötteli wrote:
Of all the applications that I can see which might get us real notice
within the Apple developer community, a superior replacement for
InterfaceBuilder, which would run on MacOS, GNU/Linux, BSD etc *and*
produce stored GUI information in a format portable between all these
systems seems the best bet.
You're right. But it's still far less important than the
cross-platform feature of Gnustep or especially GDL2 and GSWeb. Those
three are things, the other don't have at all. And
Many cross-platform APIs do already exist, many of them are even far
more usable than GNUstep as of today, so this feature really does not
(and IMHO will never) make GNUstep be unique. But then I could see a
chance for some Mac OS X developers to release their products to a
wider audience, but unfortunately there is much more than Cocoa on Mac
OS X, so again I doubt that GNUstep alone can be this solution.
-Phil
--
Philippe C.D. Robert
http://www.nice.ch/~phip
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), (continued)
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Patrick Coskren, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Helge Hess, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Patrick Coskren, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Helge Hess, 2003/10/28
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Marco Scheurer, 2003/10/29
- Re: GDL2/EOF scaling (was: Re: GNUstep roadmap), Patrick Coskren, 2003/10/29
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Dennis Leeuw, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philip Mötteli, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Philip Mötteli, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control),
Philippe C . D . Robert <=
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), tech, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Riccardo Mottola, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Helge Hess, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for quality control), Markus Hitter, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontrol), stefan, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontrol), Helge Hess, 2003/10/22
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontrol), Riccardo Mottola, 2003/10/23
- Re: GNUstep roadmap (was Re: [Suggestion] GNUstep-test for qualitycontrol), Helge Hess, 2003/10/23