discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: #import vs #include


From: Adam Fedor
Subject: Re: #import vs #include
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:41 -0700


On Tuesday, December 30, 2003, at 11:35 AM, Alex Perez wrote:

*SIGH*
Yep the G stands for GNU and the problem with #import is that it is/was depricated (from gcc). But I don't know what the current/future state of gcc will be. If the #import will be valid or that we still need to use #include and ifdefs.
In GCC 3.4 #import *IS UNDEPRECATED* We really need to pull together and clarify that in our documentation, IMO. Personally, I'd vouch for --enable-import being on in GNUstep-make by default in light of this FACT, and also that all documentation which contains this kind of FUD be changed to reflect this new reality.


--enable-import just suppresses the warning, if there is one.
Many people still use old compilers, so for them, the warning is appropriate. When they switch to gcc 3.4, gcc will of course no longer give the warning, so the --enable-import option doesn't matter. I'll change the documentation though.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]