[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XML idea
From: |
Alex Perez |
Subject: |
Re: XML idea |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:20:43 -0800 (PST) |
> There's no policy like that, that I know of.
Well, it may not be codified anywhere, but that seems to be how it is. I
think there are better alteernatives to GSXML and libxml2, namely Marcel's
excellent MPWXmlKit. It has a dependency on MPWFoundation, but I am
willing to bet that that could be fixed with very little effort. I doubt
it uses very little of the actual classes in MPWFoundation. Marcel, care
to comment?
> > My policy is to try to make external libraries optional, if at all
> possible (e.g. not critical to the operation of GNUstep) to reduce the
> frustration of people trying to compile GNUstep. Way back when libxml
> was added, it was not critical. Although perhaps it is becoming more
> so, no-one has ever changed the optional status of the library.
>
- Re: XML idea, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: XML idea, Dr. Nikolaus Schaller, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Alex Perez, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Helge Hess, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea, Adam Fedor, 2004/01/06
- Re: XML idea,
Alex Perez <=
- Re: XML idea, richard, 2004/01/07
- Re: XML idea, richard, 2004/01/07
RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/07
RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/08
Re: XML idea, Kazunobu Kuriyama, 2004/01/08
RE: XML idea, Mondragon, Ian, 2004/01/09
Re: XML idea, Kazunobu Kuriyama, 2004/01/09