Re: XML idea

[Fred Kiefer]

Alexander Malmberg wrote:
> Fred Kiefer wrote:
>
> > As much as I like to see diversity, I really don't like the idea of
> > forking GNUstep.
>
> PortabilityKit doesn't look like a fork; it's a separate library that
> implements things that GNUstep doesn't/won't.

Could you please give an example of a Cocoa extension, that was 
submitted but turned down because GNUstep doesn't want it? If not from 
the past, than at least as a theoretical experiment. It is clear, 
neither you nor I will waste our time on classes we don't like. But 
would you really trun down an implementation of NSXMLParser, if this 
could be added as an optional component to base?