On 6 Feb, 2004, at 14.07, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
On 6 Feb, 2004, at 14.02, Alexander Malmberg wrote:
Ziemowit Laski wrote:
typedef struct objc_super {
id self; /* Id of the object
sending
the message. */
Class class; /* Object's super
class.
*/
} Super, *Super_t;
[snip]
So, do you think it would be OK to rename 'class' above to, say,
'super_class'?
This field is used in GNUstep. What do you propose that code should
do
to work with both versions? Change the name only if __cplusplus is
defined?
Change the name unconditionally... please? :-)
Of course, this only applies to stuff in headers that may get pulled
into
a C++/ObjC++ translation unit. I just noticed that GNU libobjc has
local
objects named 'class' in its .c and .m files, which is fine.