|
From: | Adam Fedor |
Subject: | Re: test driven development for GNUstep |
Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:20:57 -0700 |
On Monday, February 9, 2004, at 06:17 PM, Alexander Malmberg wrote:
I think I prefer a standalone core/tests/. While the framework is nice and small now, a "testing backend" and support for generating event sequences and doing matching on the rendering output will take a fair bit of code, and that wouldn't belong in -make. Also, I already havetesting code that's needed for both -base and -gui (NSCoding tests, some class cluster tests that have concrete implementations in both -base and-gui), and that doesn't belong in -make, either.
Just a check - is it going to get s complicated that we will wish we had used a preexisting test framework? Or are the things we want to do unique enough that it's worth it?
Also, is it possible to separate the test framework from the tests so it can be used by other projects (gdl2, Gorm, etc)?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |