On 28.02.2004, at 06:21, S.J.Chun wrote:
At least, GNUstepWeb and SOPE has each merits: GNUstepWeb is much
more
compatible with WebObjects in terms of EOF, and SOPE is known for
its more
mature state. :-)
No, not really.
First: EOF is a completely separate issue, of course you could also
use GDL2
with SOPE and this isn't part of gnustep-web.
Second: I think NGObjWeb is more compatible with WebObjects than
gnustep-web
(eg concerning template parsing, though we have stripped out some
stuff for
OGo [but could put back things like "WEBOBJECT" instead of "#" or
.woo files
in case someone actually cares <I guess not>]).
I'm using and testing both of them, and it's very interesting...
Well, if you find anything where SOPE is not compatible with WO
(again: let
alone EOF, completely different framework), let me know. We could
make a list
on that and explain ;-)
PS: Absolutely no offense intended wrt gnustep-web. Its just that
NGObjWeb
should provide everything it does yet is several years more mature
and also
provides much in addition. So it might make sense to focus efforts on
this
area, but if there is no interest, I'm fine as well ;-) Of course its
really
annoying to have duplicate development.
regards,
Helge