[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
David Stes |
Subject: |
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:30:39 GMT |
User-agent: |
tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.18 (i686)) |
In comp.lang.objective-c John C. Randolph <jcr@nospam.idiom.com> wrote:
>
> You're missing the purpose of autorelease.
The poster is not missing anything. Your abusive Apple-employee-language
is completeley misplaced here.
> It's there specifically for
> the case where you *don't* want the object to go away immediately,
> although you are done with it yourself.
Yes, like in enumerating 2,000,000 objects and having 2,000,000 objects
in the autoreleasepool so that memory is released only after 2,000,000
iterations instead of immediately when the object is no longer used.
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Michael Ash, 2004/04/20
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, James Spencer, 2004/04/20
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator,
David Stes <=
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Pete French, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Sherm Pendley, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Glenn Andreas, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Michael Ash, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Ben Golding, 2004/04/23
- Re: POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Helge Hess, 2004/04/23