Re: Some questions regarding GNUstep (again)

[Fred Kiefer]

S.J.Chun wrote:
>>From my experiance, DO also works for simple tools (in GNUstep Base Source). 
>>Not sure
> for complex case. And for GUI, at least for me, is not proper for production 
> environment.
> I think Base can be used for your application and GUI to be created with 
> Win32 API. I did
> make a simple administation tool (with Win 32 GUI) for management and for us, 
> it's not
> a problem installing GNUstep Base. With install shield packaging system, 
> whole application
> + gnustep-base installed like a breeze. (Think that gnustep-base is like a 
> MFC in VC++).
> 
> 
>   Y. J. Chun wrote:
>   > 
>   > 1. Is it possible to build a standalone executable that does not require
>   > GNUstep installation? I want to deploy our product without any external
>   > dependency. If I could just ship our product along with  
>   > libgnustep-base.so.1,
>   > that is ok as our product already has internal libraries. But i see  
>   > GNUstep
>   > installation has additional support files. Is there any way i can go  
>   > without
>   > those files but just a single gnustep library?
>   > 
>   
>   I dont have any experience with this, but would expect this to be 
>   possible for a pure base application which does not use DO.
>   

Sorry for the misunderstanding, but I did not write that DO is not
working on Windows. What I tried to express is that if you only want to
install the GNUstep library, but not the rest of base (eg gdomap) than
you rather should stick with an application that doesn't use DO.