[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NSProcessInfo is not initialized when debugging
From: |
Martin Kuball |
Subject: |
Re: NSProcessInfo is not initialized when debugging |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2004 15:19:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Am Friday 04 June 2004 12:12 schrieb Jeff Teunissen:
> Eric Heintzmann wrote:
> > On 2004-06-03 13:55:24 +0200 Jeff Teunissen <deek@d2dc.net> wrote:
> > > Adam Fedor wrote:
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > >> I think to be safe, you should only have debug versions of
> > >> everything on non-debug versions of everything installed. Not
> > >> both. Hopefully this
> > >> can be fixed soon, though.
> > >
> > > How about just eliminating debug libs?
> >
> > On debian system, the GNUstep debug libs are available in
> > separate packages, and we think this is the user who should
> > choose if he wants to install them or not.
> > But yes, we can explicitely remove them at build time if better.
>
> I mean from GNUstep, since Debian -dbg lib packages are simply the
> regular libs, but unstripped -- which GNUstep debug libs are
> definitely not.
I would really like to understand the implications of this. I mean
speed, code size, and possible problems with gcc using optimization
and debug switch at the same time.
Martin
- Re: Debug libs (Was: Re: NSProcessInfo is not initialized when debugging), (continued)
Re: NSProcessInfo is not initialized when debugging, Eric Heintzmann, 2004/06/03
Re: NSProcessInfo is not initialized when debugging, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2004/06/04
Re: NSProcessInfo is not initialized when debugging,
Martin Kuball <=
Re: NSProcessInfo is not initialized when debugging, Jeff Teunissen, 2004/06/06