Re: [Q] shared version of libobjc

[Kazunobu Kuriyama]

Nicola Pero wrote:

> > As the manual or other documents say nothing about if, I'm wondering 
> > if I can
> > rely on it.
> >
> > Does anyone knows something about it?
>
>
> libobjc.so built by GCC has been working very well for years now.
>
> Thanks
Great.  Then I guess there should be a Makefile macro in -make which
forces the linker to use a static libobjc when that macro is specified
(in particular, for such systems that allow us to install both static
and shared libraries).  Is there such a macro?  Or should I hack other
macros such as LDFLAGS, say LDFLAGS='-static -lobjc', to control the
linker when static linking is needed?

Thanks.
Kazunobu Kuriyama